A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, where allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times short article about René Collier and also the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up coated intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as viewers sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial instant in the legal timeline.
With the Main of the dispute is actually a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was accepted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been described as meticulous in his examination of preparing documents, maps, and circumstances attached for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their extensive-standing relationship to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea in the course of a storm, don't alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for the circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.