A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, particularly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they had been intended to Obtain visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o throughout intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the lawful timeline.
In the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household dwelling in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times moving into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing situations. But the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living together with each other extended after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.